Cementality

VS

Induction

Instances of Compelling DIO Discoveries Which Have Met Revealingly Pathetic Incomprehension By the AAS' History-of-Astronomy Cult






The following solutions have been on the record for many years. Some have even appeared in highly prominent journals and forums. But most of the history-of-astronomy center is not technically and-or emotionally capable of coping with the obviousness of the triumphs of long-resented unorthodoxy, achieved by those whose scientific skills have so often embarrassed that selfsame seething centrist cult.

DIO's failure to enlighten the unenlightenable is not surprising. But to see the dim determined to stay heart-wrenchingly dim is a needless spectacle, since concurrent competing displays have rendered it superfluous, e.g., the White House, the US' public school system, etc.

Several examples follow.
(See also $1000 challenges at DIO 11.2 [2003] p.33. And the long list of eminent-historian slips at DIO 4.1 [1994] ‡4 §A [p.48], none retracted by anyone but the best of the field, Alex Jones.)


  • Aubrey Diller-DR solution for the Hipparchos-Strabo klimata table.
    (DIO 4.2 [1994] p.56 Table 1.)

  • The Hipparchos parallax sign-error, which (very) neatly explains one of the most perplexing discrepancies (over a full degree) in Hipparchos' output. Error repeated modernly by J.Evans.
    (DIO 1.3 [1991] n.288 [p.173].)

  • Examples of Inductive Fruitfulness:

    1. Eratosthenes & Poseidonios Earth-Sizes: hugely disparate, yet both's errors (1 part in 6, positive & negative, resp) neatly explained by same theory: distortion due to horizontal light-rays' atmospheric-refraction-curvature, which equals 1/6 of Earth's curvature.
      (DIO 6.1 [1996] ‡1 n.47 [p.11].)

    2. Both hitherto-mysterious Hipparchos lunar numbers, 3144 & 3122 1/2, are found to have a startlingly cohesive — and historically revealing — common solution, to the full (extremely high) precision displayed.
      (DIO 1.3 [1991] §§O2&O3 [pp.160-161] eqs.23&24. See also H.Thurston's intelligent discussion of this finding in the History of Science Society's Isis — vol.93 #1 pp.58-69 [2002].)

    3. DR showed that Pliny's circuli came from a clever ancient linear fit to Mediterranean data computed from sph trig. This theory then led on to a perfect solution of Pliny's otherwise wildly disparate Rhodos klima.

    4. Solution of Hipparchos' mis-latitude of Carthage is consistent with same odd explanation for Alexandria's mis-latitude — in the very same paragraph of Pliny.

    5. Aristarchos' Great Year solution and possession of the precise Babylonian month. (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 297:295; and simultaneously DIO 11.2 [2003] ‡1 eqs.12&13.)